pj's cure for the oil addicted
pj's cure for the oil addicted
Pearl Jam Announces Carbon Portfolio Strategy for 2006 World Tour
Monday July 10, 1:00 pm ET
SEATTLE, WA--(MARKET WIRE)--Jul 10, 2006 -- In an effort to mitigate
their own carbon emissions while raising the public's carbon
consciousness, Pearl Jam today announced the launch of their 2006
Carbon
Portfolio Strategy. Through this Strategy, the band will donate a
total
of $100,000 to nine organizations doing innovative work around climate
change, renewable energy, and the environment.
"We established the Carbon Portfolio Strategy in the hopes of creating
new models for businesses like ours looking to invest in the future
health of our planet and its delicate ecosphere," said Stone Gossard
of
Pearl Jam. "Our Carbon Portfolio Strategy unites the combined efforts
of
nine diverse groups all approaching the issue of carbon in distinctive
and unique ways. We hope that by highlighting and creating a commons
for
these groups, we can help to advance a broad and synergistic strategy
that encourages preservation of existing ecosystems, restoration of
degraded environments, and broad stimulus for clean, renewable energy
technologies."
Since 2003, Pearl Jam has employed a variety of approaches --
including
rainforest preservation and the use of pure bio-diesel for their 2006
US
tour -- to help offset carbon emissions produced by the band's tours
and
day-to-day business operations. The Carbon Portfolio Strategy builds
on
these earlier efforts by helping advance clean renewable energy and
carbon mitigation. "We are honored to be part of this collaborative
effort and would like to express our gratitude for the leadership and
passion of all these diverse groups," remarked Gossard.
thank god for stone . . . the silent environt one.
the hubby's rainforest
i love pearl jam. i can't wait to tell the hubby about this. i think i'm going to call him even though he's at work. that ecuadorian rain forest is very close to his heart. he spent thanksgiving there one year while he was in the navy. it's one of a handful of truly beautiful, worthwhile experiences he had while he was in
What can we do about our CO2 footprint, given the CO2 air-travel creates?
Stone Gossard:
Everyone has to balance out what their job is – it will require a certain amount of carbon output. Where you can make inroads is in becoming more energy efficient if you can. If you can't, a carbon offset or doing something to counteract the carbon you're emitting is a great way to go.
This particular project with CI – replanting native species in what was degraded Ecuadorian rain forest is one component of Pearl Jam's offset. We've also invested in Green Tags through Bonneville Environmental Foundation and also through Honor the Earth. These allow people to pay a premium to bring more clean, renewable energy online to the grid.
There are a variety of other organizations doing a variety of things to promote clean, renewable energy or restore degraded lands with tress. These are bold, great opportunities with which you can begin to address your carbon issues.
http://discuss.conservation.org/content ... etail/851/
What can we do about our CO2 footprint, given the CO2 air-travel creates?
Stone Gossard:
Everyone has to balance out what their job is – it will require a certain amount of carbon output. Where you can make inroads is in becoming more energy efficient if you can. If you can't, a carbon offset or doing something to counteract the carbon you're emitting is a great way to go.
This particular project with CI – replanting native species in what was degraded Ecuadorian rain forest is one component of Pearl Jam's offset. We've also invested in Green Tags through Bonneville Environmental Foundation and also through Honor the Earth. These allow people to pay a premium to bring more clean, renewable energy online to the grid.
There are a variety of other organizations doing a variety of things to promote clean, renewable energy or restore degraded lands with tress. These are bold, great opportunities with which you can begin to address your carbon issues.
http://discuss.conservation.org/content ... etail/851/
-
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 1:37 pm
- Location: usa
- Contact:
But what if they refused ever to tour again, after this, because of global warming? Then there would be no need to donate to environmental causes to make up for it, right? And would PJ fans get really mad and storm the barricades because they couldn't see the band again? What do you think? I'm serious and curious.
Sorry, not trying to piss anyone off, but that was one of my first thoughts when I first read about this, which incidentally wasn't from you Sarah, but from a local paper. My thought was "well it seems a bit strange for them to go ahead and tour when they could just cut back their tour and not have to donate to environmental charity as much to make up for it in guilt".
I mean if there was a band I really loved, I mean really, really loved, especially if they were as big and popular as PJ and they said "sorry we love you fans but we are going to spare the environment entirely by the fossil fuels we would waste by touring" then I would only love them all the more, right? I would hole up in my house with my loved one(s) and really enjoy their music and forget about seeing them live for a good reason. But if they instead do one thing and donate to make up for it...it's like...I don't understand?
Do you think they have the money to stop touring?
Sorry, not trying to piss anyone off, but that was one of my first thoughts when I first read about this, which incidentally wasn't from you Sarah, but from a local paper. My thought was "well it seems a bit strange for them to go ahead and tour when they could just cut back their tour and not have to donate to environmental charity as much to make up for it in guilt".
I mean if there was a band I really loved, I mean really, really loved, especially if they were as big and popular as PJ and they said "sorry we love you fans but we are going to spare the environment entirely by the fossil fuels we would waste by touring" then I would only love them all the more, right? I would hole up in my house with my loved one(s) and really enjoy their music and forget about seeing them live for a good reason. But if they instead do one thing and donate to make up for it...it's like...I don't understand?
Do you think they have the money to stop touring?
hey rosie! that's nice, thanks. it's always good to hear from you.
"But what if they refused ever to tour again, after this, because of global warming? Then there would be no need to donate to environmental causes to make up for it, right? And would PJ fans get really mad and storm the barricades because they couldn't see the band again? What do you think? I'm serious and curious."
i understand why you're asking questions. yep, i think pj fans would be pissed. i went out to get my mom a b-day present recently -- and ended up buying the hubby two magazines that had them on the cover; one of them had an article that compared them -- the relationship with the fans -- to the dead in certain ways, the author was quick to point out ways they differ, but the fans are very dedicated and have a feeling like the band is a great old friend -- the music has been with a lot of the fans through all kinds of changes and has changed with them-- sort of like a life long friendship with the music. fans would really hate missing the tours, but . . . they are not coming to the south this year, and we're not pissed. i think some folks are but my friends and the hubby are like, well, that's disappointing, but . . .okay. we actually looked into going to see them in england, but that would have been terrible, financially and environmentally -- we were super tempted, then i found out i was pregnant and i was really glad we decided not to go.
"I mean if there was a band I really loved, I mean really, really loved, especially if they were as big and popular as PJ and they said "sorry we love you fans but we are going to spare the environment entirely by the fossil fuels we would waste by touring" then I would only love them all the more, right? I would hole up in my house with my loved one(s) and really enjoy their music and forget about seeing them live for a good reason."
right, true. i'd be like that. so would the hubby -- respect them even more. we have so many bootlegs of live shows that we would do something similar to that, not holing up, but doing our own thing with the music w/o the live show. we acutally used to do it a lot years ago, we'd open all the windows and doors, in the house, put five discs in, turn it up, get a bunch of beer and go outside on the back deck and have our own concert, for free, sort of.
"But if they instead do one thing and donate to make up for it...it's like...I don't understand?"
right, i've heard people say that. i don't know. i think of it the same way i think of my recycling, especially plastic b/c it's a petroleum product (and also sort of the way i thought of st. jude's extended metaphor of consuming too much and dieting); i've cut down on using plastic, but i've not stopped using / buying plastic entirely. should i? like the other day, i left my canteen at home and i had been out walking for two miles midday, very stupid of me yes, but i needed water and bought some in a plastic bottle b/c i needed it. it's sort of like that for me. should i not use this computer b/c it's made of plastic, etc. or should i not recycle any plastic or talk to other people about cutting down on the use of plastics and recycling them b/c i do use/waste some plastic?
i think what they are doing is a step in a more responsible direction, a step that we've not seen a lot of musicians or any other professions for that matter make, guster with the campus eco-awareness tour, neil young and willie w/ biodiesel, dmb with the purchase of forests, i can't think of any others, not that they don't exist, but a lot of musicians tour and do major damage to the environment with that without thinking twice about helping the environment. and i think it's just an attempt at more responsible compensation for using our environment, who else compensates the environment at all for using up the environment while doing their job?
and if nothing else it raises their fans awareness of how much carbon folks use when traveling and does negate some environmental damage. but i don't know -- people, many, have had similar questions about gore and his travels during inconvenient truth tour, and i can understand
if they stopped touring i don't know what would happen to their money/fan base. i know when they stopped mtv appearances and stopped working with ticketmaster (although that didn't last) they didn't fade away or become irrelevant, etc - - most of the fans still loved them regardless.
"But what if they refused ever to tour again, after this, because of global warming? Then there would be no need to donate to environmental causes to make up for it, right? And would PJ fans get really mad and storm the barricades because they couldn't see the band again? What do you think? I'm serious and curious."
i understand why you're asking questions. yep, i think pj fans would be pissed. i went out to get my mom a b-day present recently -- and ended up buying the hubby two magazines that had them on the cover; one of them had an article that compared them -- the relationship with the fans -- to the dead in certain ways, the author was quick to point out ways they differ, but the fans are very dedicated and have a feeling like the band is a great old friend -- the music has been with a lot of the fans through all kinds of changes and has changed with them-- sort of like a life long friendship with the music. fans would really hate missing the tours, but . . . they are not coming to the south this year, and we're not pissed. i think some folks are but my friends and the hubby are like, well, that's disappointing, but . . .okay. we actually looked into going to see them in england, but that would have been terrible, financially and environmentally -- we were super tempted, then i found out i was pregnant and i was really glad we decided not to go.
"I mean if there was a band I really loved, I mean really, really loved, especially if they were as big and popular as PJ and they said "sorry we love you fans but we are going to spare the environment entirely by the fossil fuels we would waste by touring" then I would only love them all the more, right? I would hole up in my house with my loved one(s) and really enjoy their music and forget about seeing them live for a good reason."
right, true. i'd be like that. so would the hubby -- respect them even more. we have so many bootlegs of live shows that we would do something similar to that, not holing up, but doing our own thing with the music w/o the live show. we acutally used to do it a lot years ago, we'd open all the windows and doors, in the house, put five discs in, turn it up, get a bunch of beer and go outside on the back deck and have our own concert, for free, sort of.
"But if they instead do one thing and donate to make up for it...it's like...I don't understand?"
right, i've heard people say that. i don't know. i think of it the same way i think of my recycling, especially plastic b/c it's a petroleum product (and also sort of the way i thought of st. jude's extended metaphor of consuming too much and dieting); i've cut down on using plastic, but i've not stopped using / buying plastic entirely. should i? like the other day, i left my canteen at home and i had been out walking for two miles midday, very stupid of me yes, but i needed water and bought some in a plastic bottle b/c i needed it. it's sort of like that for me. should i not use this computer b/c it's made of plastic, etc. or should i not recycle any plastic or talk to other people about cutting down on the use of plastics and recycling them b/c i do use/waste some plastic?
i think what they are doing is a step in a more responsible direction, a step that we've not seen a lot of musicians or any other professions for that matter make, guster with the campus eco-awareness tour, neil young and willie w/ biodiesel, dmb with the purchase of forests, i can't think of any others, not that they don't exist, but a lot of musicians tour and do major damage to the environment with that without thinking twice about helping the environment. and i think it's just an attempt at more responsible compensation for using our environment, who else compensates the environment at all for using up the environment while doing their job?
and if nothing else it raises their fans awareness of how much carbon folks use when traveling and does negate some environmental damage. but i don't know -- people, many, have had similar questions about gore and his travels during inconvenient truth tour, and i can understand
if they stopped touring i don't know what would happen to their money/fan base. i know when they stopped mtv appearances and stopped working with ticketmaster (although that didn't last) they didn't fade away or become irrelevant, etc - - most of the fans still loved them regardless.
I appreciate your answer to my questions, Sarah. It's funny you mention DMB I've actually been having a bit of a revisitation with Dave Matthews Band of late. I got into their music (well their first two albums) ten years ago, and decided to pull them out and found I still liked them very much. I don't care that there are a lot of stupid college students into them. They suck now though and I wouldn't bother to go see them live or buy their CD's anymore.
- Tommy Martyn
- Mile High Club
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 8:01 am
- Location: a desk
About six weeks ago, I was invited to see Pearl Jam here in Cincinnati. I was a guest in a corporate box. I've done this before for sporting events and was curious to see what a band would be like. The short answer is: crap. It sucks the atmosphere out of the equation in a way that the free beer can not compensate for. It might have been different though, if I knew everybody there. As it was, I was mostly a stranger. A strippergram arrived in the lull between the bands. The guy who was the guest of honour was backing away from her saying that he was happily married and could she leave him alone. The stripper looked all embarrasssed to be spurned and didn't know quite what to do. It was all a bit sad really.
I'm not a big Pearl Jam fan. They're OK. Just not my cup of tea. However I must say this, they put on a hell of a show. They don't fuck about.
Some of the things that Eddie Veddder did were very cool. The opening act was that guy who was in guided by voices. (Robert what's his face - Marky help me out) Support acts can get largely ignored in stadiums, so to make sure this didn't happen Eddie came out and did a duet on the first song. The milling throngs poured in to see what was going on and so the opening act got a big crowd. Then on their last number he came out and did backing vocals/dancing so that when they finished there was a huge ovation. I thought this was a very gracious way to treat a support act.
When they did come out they ripped right into the set and didn't pause between the first five songs. After that Eddie treated us to a few musings. All of which seemed sincere. He talked about the history of the venue. The Colloseum in Cincinnati is the place where people were crushed to death years ago when The Who played there. Eddie talked about a gig in Germany where the same thing happened to them. I was bemused by the crowd. He mentioned that after that it happened to them, he recieved a phone call from Roger Daltrey and Pete Townsend. The crowd were whooping and cheering at the mention of these names in the middle of what was obviously not a jolly tale. Later he stopped and talked of a young man who had various problems who has gone missing. He held up a poster of the guy and gave information about how to help. The man in question had a Pearl Jam tatoo. He said that he felt that the man was, "one of our own." Once again I was impressed by his sincerity. Something not easily communicated to 15,000 people.
I really did come away with different opinion of the band. And I was more surprised about that tahtn anybody.
I'm not a big Pearl Jam fan. They're OK. Just not my cup of tea. However I must say this, they put on a hell of a show. They don't fuck about.
Some of the things that Eddie Veddder did were very cool. The opening act was that guy who was in guided by voices. (Robert what's his face - Marky help me out) Support acts can get largely ignored in stadiums, so to make sure this didn't happen Eddie came out and did a duet on the first song. The milling throngs poured in to see what was going on and so the opening act got a big crowd. Then on their last number he came out and did backing vocals/dancing so that when they finished there was a huge ovation. I thought this was a very gracious way to treat a support act.
When they did come out they ripped right into the set and didn't pause between the first five songs. After that Eddie treated us to a few musings. All of which seemed sincere. He talked about the history of the venue. The Colloseum in Cincinnati is the place where people were crushed to death years ago when The Who played there. Eddie talked about a gig in Germany where the same thing happened to them. I was bemused by the crowd. He mentioned that after that it happened to them, he recieved a phone call from Roger Daltrey and Pete Townsend. The crowd were whooping and cheering at the mention of these names in the middle of what was obviously not a jolly tale. Later he stopped and talked of a young man who had various problems who has gone missing. He held up a poster of the guy and gave information about how to help. The man in question had a Pearl Jam tatoo. He said that he felt that the man was, "one of our own." Once again I was impressed by his sincerity. Something not easily communicated to 15,000 people.
I really did come away with different opinion of the band. And I was more surprised about that tahtn anybody.
-
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:55 am
PJ: Love 'em....n'......come on people!!
PJ Lovers,
Okay, okay...I (do) like Pearl Jam, and have for many years, but I still think anytime anyone with any influence, either politically or socially takes a stand on an important issue,.....those that follow need some direction in their life.
Direction by honest people in that individuals life. A role model. Granted, there are far to few and in-between, but we need better role models for our youth.
I am going to write some shit down now that I probably shouldn't, but I am drunk and feel like typing....SO THERE!!!!...read if you want...or don't. I am not sure where this will go....so......try not to bust my chops. THX.
Let's be honest here: Everyone on earth needs (5) five things in life to be (socially happy, and emotionally at peace with themselves)....
1: To be loved by someone.
2: To be accepted by most.
3. To be comfortable with the money they make and the service they provide. (whatever it may be)
4. The belief that they will make a difference. (NOT just for themselves, but for someone else as well)
5. That they can lie on their death bed and be happy with the life they've lived.
Assuming I am only 80% accurate in these five statements,... I can live with that. Obviously, everyone will have their own additions and arguments to this, but I think these five are a pretty good start. Just think.....If we could have (20) optimistic statements like these, maybe people in general, or the youth of today, could get a better grasp on the meaning of life and what it means to each individual.
They sometimes say.."It's nothing personal, it's just business."
FUCK THEM ALL!!!!!!!!!!
EVERYTHING should be personal!! What the hell else is there in this world????
SJ- Gnite PaxA
Okay, okay...I (do) like Pearl Jam, and have for many years, but I still think anytime anyone with any influence, either politically or socially takes a stand on an important issue,.....those that follow need some direction in their life.
Direction by honest people in that individuals life. A role model. Granted, there are far to few and in-between, but we need better role models for our youth.
I am going to write some shit down now that I probably shouldn't, but I am drunk and feel like typing....SO THERE!!!!...read if you want...or don't. I am not sure where this will go....so......try not to bust my chops. THX.
Let's be honest here: Everyone on earth needs (5) five things in life to be (socially happy, and emotionally at peace with themselves)....
1: To be loved by someone.
2: To be accepted by most.
3. To be comfortable with the money they make and the service they provide. (whatever it may be)
4. The belief that they will make a difference. (NOT just for themselves, but for someone else as well)
5. That they can lie on their death bed and be happy with the life they've lived.
Assuming I am only 80% accurate in these five statements,... I can live with that. Obviously, everyone will have their own additions and arguments to this, but I think these five are a pretty good start. Just think.....If we could have (20) optimistic statements like these, maybe people in general, or the youth of today, could get a better grasp on the meaning of life and what it means to each individual.
They sometimes say.."It's nothing personal, it's just business."
FUCK THEM ALL!!!!!!!!!!
EVERYTHING should be personal!! What the hell else is there in this world????
SJ- Gnite PaxA
-
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:55 am
Sorry to rant...
PAX,
I appologize for my going on and on. From music, sports and life, my thoughts sometimes get carried off in another direction. If this posting is offbeat from the rest......my bad! I hope all of you are doing well. I am going to try and finish my drunken evening by passing out with a couple more shots of JD.
Best wishes to all,
SJ
I appologize for my going on and on. From music, sports and life, my thoughts sometimes get carried off in another direction. If this posting is offbeat from the rest......my bad! I hope all of you are doing well. I am going to try and finish my drunken evening by passing out with a couple more shots of JD.
Best wishes to all,
SJ