Is McCutcheon bi-sexual?

mmenabi · Post by **mmenabi** » Fri Apr 25, 2003 7:22 am

mcc is way too sexy to restrict himself to just girls.

Myke115 · Post by **Myke115** » Fri Apr 25, 2003 7:56 am

A good gay friend of mine claims that all heterosexual men are latently gay to a certain degree.

Oh ... I wonder if the new member got her name from the Anne Rice vampire character of the same name? I've got the novel "Merrick" but haven't had a chance to read it yet.

myke

xquisid3 · Post by **xquisid3** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 5:51 am

who cares.
this has got to be the funniest topic ever written.
enough said.

h. · Post by h. » Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:35 am

meee-ow...

ROSEMARY · Post by **ROSEMARY** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 9:34 am

is mc bisex?
well i know the answer . i have pix to prove it. can they make the gallery? and, but , and then again,
who cares
if they are bi they are not worth the time or the blow job because isn't it about concentration
on a subject?
how can one be scattered?
you might as well have a.d.d.
stick to yuor subject. be aroused , but stay on task. bisexual is so 1990's,
x, were you even alive in the 90's?

marky · Post by **marky** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 10:02 am

BTW, Sun3x, you don't have to be a libertarian or coke snorter to hang out. I'm neither one. Not sure where you got the libertarian connection. Nader's been discussed here, but he's a Green.

marky · Post by **marky** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 10:11 am

Also, having met McC in person, I'm going to have to agree with Ooh that McC just doesn't come across as "effeminate".

xquisid3 · Post by **xquisid3** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 10:05 pm

i hope rosie is speaking to me. besides the obvious, i lived in the 90's. damn straight. if youre speaking of living an alternative lifestyle- of course.
im a lesbian. rabbit may have forgotten to mention that small fact. so therefore i think asking about sexual orientation out of curiosity is..well, funny.
so i have to ask. if bi-sexuality is 90's are we out of style? i would rather be called a lipstick instead of out of style.
to those of you that know her: is she always so feisty? not that i mind. i think its kinda cute.

martino · Post by **martino** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 10:42 pm

what is it with the dash?

i mean, are the rest of us homo-sexual or hetero-sexual? or does the dash in bi-sexual imply a certain pronounciation, a certain pause between 'bi' and sexual? Maybe we should do that cute dr. doom thing with the index and middle fingers of both hands indicating inverted commas? "wiggle 'bi' sexual," is that the way to say it?

i once worked with this japanese guy, he was always telling me how he was certainly not "a homosexualist". but certainly, he was a closet case.

Post by **mccutcheon** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 10:54 pm

Rosie is Rosie. Love her or hate her. To me she is like the cops, a total buzz kill. I feel better when she isn't around. And like the cops, she shows up where she isn't wanted. Why she posts here I don't know, but I never like it.

So X if you are from the island of Lesbo even Bee Gee hair wouldn't have worked for Rabbit, unless maybe that head of hair was on a female truck driver. Sorry for the poor sterotype, but even lesbians get made fun of here, them being a jolly bunch they can roll with the punches.

martino · Post by **martino** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 10:59 pm

ok, now does anybody want to hear what i have to say about gay blow-jobs? (or was it blowjobs? hell, english is so fucking difficult!)

no? are you sure?

what the hell, i'm gonna tell you anyway! that's how it is on a BB, nobody has to shut up, even when nobodys listening!

i'll tell you what's great about gay blowjobs. what's great is: they are not great. it makes it easy to kick the habit. it is strange but true. at least when i got some, that is what i found...

women know all about sex. women understand the concept of moisture and lubrication -- that you can never have too much. women know you need plenty of spit with the polish. men, at least those who did it for me (and i have to qualify that all this was over a decade ago, and not particularly frequent) seem to think that when you blow, you have to blow. or that the point in sucking is to suck. obviously, nothing is farther from the truth.

for me, men have regularly been a disappointment. in contrast, even mediocre lovers are good when they are female, if they have a modicum of enthusiasm. women have less of the gay prissiness with semen -- which is no surprise at all.

women have, as a rule, the nicer bodies, the more interesting personalities, more satisfying hangups. they, as a rule, do not suck when they suck. believe me, the alternative to women is not that -- it is not an alternative.

thanks for your kind attention.

Post by **mccutcheon** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:04 pm

you are drunk and going to regret this in the morning. moi, je ne regret non plus.

martino · Post by **martino** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:13 pm

and while i am getting all embarassing and personal... my best drinking buddy kenorbi recently said this to me:

"man m, whenever you meet somebody, you make the impression that you are making up your mind whether you should either fuck 'em or fight 'em, or to find that particular person totally uninteresting. can't you just be nice?"

i said he was totally wrong but i strangely i couldn't give him an example. later however i thought: there are plenty of people who don't fit into the fuck/fight or trash'em category. like mc: i don't want to fight him, i certainly don't want fuck him, but he is intruigingly interesting. (of course, there are some people on this board who are sexually interesting to me, but that is another story. and no more about the people i would like to fight, please).

Post by **mccutcheon** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:15 pm

You peaceful orgy loving Germans.

Post by **mccutcheon** » Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:20 pm

And by the way, 'there are some people who are sexually intriguing to me' Well, Martino, I think if you weren't so drunk you wouldn't talk about the Sloth that way. I think it's time for you to come visit your auntie again.