Lemmy Have It --- Motorheads
Lemmy Have It --- Motorheads
Don't just use the poll, please elucidate
Well I don't feel it's right for me to complain about darkness as my monitor sucks to begin with, so things are usually darker than they should be. That's why I was surprised that the picture of H. is crisp and clear for me, whereas the picture of Martino is too dark for me to make out much but a silhouette. 
No, I think the board is fine. Just please, let me delete my own posts...
I thought the BB of BB was so that the 'bad behavior' part (or if you're gonna spell it the British way, 'behaviour') would from hereon be a secret we would all share. Our own in-joke, so to speak. But I may be wrong. I don't care whether it's spelled out or not.
No, I think the board is fine. Just please, let me delete my own posts...
I thought the BB of BB was so that the 'bad behavior' part (or if you're gonna spell it the British way, 'behaviour') would from hereon be a secret we would all share. Our own in-joke, so to speak. But I may be wrong. I don't care whether it's spelled out or not.
I finally figured out the "remember me" box. It only took being told about it twice. So now I've checked it on my home computer and my work computer, so you can bet McCutcheon will be posting under my name alot. It used to say "welcome, Maverick", or whoever, and then you'd always know if you were logged in as yourself, or perhaps as McCutcheon, for example. If it's possible, it would be cool if the thing that says who's in were in a more obvious place than down in the bottom.
Also, where is this server located...London? It says the time now is 2:40 tomorrow morning, when it's actually 8:40 sunday night. Weird.
Also, where is this server located...London? It says the time now is 2:40 tomorrow morning, when it's actually 8:40 sunday night. Weird.
oh come on now you miserable whingers, the fucking thing works well enough. i just hate it when people complain about something that is free.
it's so last-century to critique the aesthetics of a website that is based neither on subscriptions nor on advertising.
value-for-money is all i care about, and this BB is right up there with the best (at least when the written contributions are brighter than ditchwater, but that, to mix some metaphors, is a whole different kettle of fish, isn't it)
it's so last-century to critique the aesthetics of a website that is based neither on subscriptions nor on advertising.
value-for-money is all i care about, and this BB is right up there with the best (at least when the written contributions are brighter than ditchwater, but that, to mix some metaphors, is a whole different kettle of fish, isn't it)
