aviator

[martino]

gorgeous on a fatass wide screen: great cinematography, glorious scenery, persuasive effects. thus not at all boring despite a length of almost three hours.

but why does di caprio always look and sound like a boy stuck in a man's suit? i am saying this while i acknowledge that he does some fine acting in aviator. still, he is just so child-prodigial, so cute, so ungrownup that it annoys me.

and am i the only person who is unconvinced by cate blanchett's over-acting?

and where is the psychology? wherein the cause or at least the explanation for howard hughes' mental disease? what made him tick? was it just boys-with-toys taken to the extreme, or something more, something substantial, something of greater interest?

somebody please explain this to me, so that i can enjoy this good-but-flawed movie better. thank you.

[mccutcheon]

I haven't seen it.

[Zapelomen]

I haven't seen it.

do your face a favor and correct your mistake: see it.