Luis Bunuel?
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 3:35 pm
Frankly .... I've never heard of Luis Bunuel so I have no opinion good or bad on him.
I do have an opinion, however, on how people with dissenting points of view are treated. I remember when everyone was up in arms over some of the laws that were passed here after 09/11 that were seen as restricting civil liberties ... such as the right to dissent. It was appalling to many here as it seemed also that people who disagreed with the war in Iraq were thought of as unpatriotic and protests should be stifled. Hey ... I'm all for dissent. You should dissent if you feel the need ... no matter what the cause.
Sooo ... why is it that when someone ardently disagrees with the prevailing points of view here whether it be political ideology or the arts that they literally get trampled? Hell, I know it happens. It happened to me several times. I only stayed around as one of the proprietors of the board, Mr. McCutcheon,plainly told me that what makes Pax interesting is the mix of genders, ideas, thoughts, opinions, religious philosophies, and sexual orientations. Martin Balsimico even called me a "cold motherfucker" and tried to get everyone to ignore me. Luckily, no one seemed to follow suit that I know of. I never cursed him. I plainly stated my opinions and dissents ... this doesn't mean you have to attack personally.
And here we go again ... this new guy Tommy comes on and makes a very mild comment on Jeff Buckley and gets railed at by Mark. He states that he thinks that people join the bandwagon of agreeability (which seems to be true sometimes) and basically gets called an idiot by Martin. I have to say that if Martin is going to quote Oscar Wilde on boring and charming people ... isn't that argument coming across as arrogant as he is calling Tommy? Saying "Psychogenic stupid things" ... isn't that the pot calling the kettle black??? Hell, Martin is the oldest guy here (that I know of) and is always the first to call names like a juvenile. What is up with that???
It's gonna get dull sometimes. So what if someone says so? Why get so personally offended??
"Gang of wankers with cultural cliff notes " ... that was kinda amusing.
myke
PS -- Yo, Brett ... if the Canadian monolith doesn't take over the Carolinas, can you at least find me a job in Vancouver so I can move the hell oughta here???? Talk about being bored!!!
PS2 -- If you wanna see a good, classy action move, see "the Italian Job" starring Charlese Therone, Mark Wahlberg, Seth Green, Donald Sutherland, Mos Def, and Jason Statham. Was much better than I expected. Loved the scenes in Venice.
I do have an opinion, however, on how people with dissenting points of view are treated. I remember when everyone was up in arms over some of the laws that were passed here after 09/11 that were seen as restricting civil liberties ... such as the right to dissent. It was appalling to many here as it seemed also that people who disagreed with the war in Iraq were thought of as unpatriotic and protests should be stifled. Hey ... I'm all for dissent. You should dissent if you feel the need ... no matter what the cause.
Sooo ... why is it that when someone ardently disagrees with the prevailing points of view here whether it be political ideology or the arts that they literally get trampled? Hell, I know it happens. It happened to me several times. I only stayed around as one of the proprietors of the board, Mr. McCutcheon,plainly told me that what makes Pax interesting is the mix of genders, ideas, thoughts, opinions, religious philosophies, and sexual orientations. Martin Balsimico even called me a "cold motherfucker" and tried to get everyone to ignore me. Luckily, no one seemed to follow suit that I know of. I never cursed him. I plainly stated my opinions and dissents ... this doesn't mean you have to attack personally.
And here we go again ... this new guy Tommy comes on and makes a very mild comment on Jeff Buckley and gets railed at by Mark. He states that he thinks that people join the bandwagon of agreeability (which seems to be true sometimes) and basically gets called an idiot by Martin. I have to say that if Martin is going to quote Oscar Wilde on boring and charming people ... isn't that argument coming across as arrogant as he is calling Tommy? Saying "Psychogenic stupid things" ... isn't that the pot calling the kettle black??? Hell, Martin is the oldest guy here (that I know of) and is always the first to call names like a juvenile. What is up with that???
It's gonna get dull sometimes. So what if someone says so? Why get so personally offended??
"Gang of wankers with cultural cliff notes " ... that was kinda amusing.
myke
PS -- Yo, Brett ... if the Canadian monolith doesn't take over the Carolinas, can you at least find me a job in Vancouver so I can move the hell oughta here???? Talk about being bored!!!
PS2 -- If you wanna see a good, classy action move, see "the Italian Job" starring Charlese Therone, Mark Wahlberg, Seth Green, Donald Sutherland, Mos Def, and Jason Statham. Was much better than I expected. Loved the scenes in Venice.