Luna- Days of our Nights

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon May 03, 2004 8:55 pm

I got this album at the record fair and was listening to it today and was reminded how good it is. it is a masterpiece. and then remembered somewhere deep in my mind that there were problems with this record. so I did a google search and this is what I found. man this guy is so wrong. but it makes me sad how badly people suck and can't see greatness around them. oh yeah and as he has an opinion, so do I. this guys sucks. If you like songs about drinking and new york and life and relationships and Guns and Roses buy this album. it's a lost classic.

LUNA'S LATEST ALBUM GOT THE BAND DUMPED BY ELEKTRA.
FOR ONCE, A MAJOR LABEL MADE THE RIGHT CALL.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Seth Mnookin

Nov. 12, 1999 | Late last summer, Luna's longtime label, Elektra, dumped the band just weeks before the scheduled release of "Days of Our Nights." Hearing this, it was hard not to hope that "Days" would be a triumphant album. Luna had always seemed a bit out of place on a major label, and it seemed conceivable that the Elektra decision was just another example of corporate cluelessness. Maybe the Luna album would confirm this, or even prove that there are fewer reasons than ever to believe that there are small pockets of hope in the increasingly harsh world of the majors.

But "Days of Our Nights" is not a triumphant record -- it's not even a decent record. "Days," which was released in Europe a few months ago, recently picked up by indie label Jericho and is now being distributed in the States by Sire, makes it pretty clear that after a few albums' worth of lackluster sales, Elektra finally dropped Luna because the album sucks.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Luna

"Days of Our Nights"
Jericho/Sire

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As recently as 1996, it seemed as if Luna were finally ready to become the disaffected voice for a generation of sensitive souls raised on Morrissey and R.E.M. But where singer-guitarist Dean Wareham's weary, worldly wonder once was sharp and knowing, it now seems dull and insipid. Several years ago, Wareham was reeling off cutting couplets like, "And if you read your poetry aloud to me/I'll have to show you to the door." Now, the best he can do is this: "You made an educated guess/'Cuz you're an educated girl."

Evidence of Wareham's lyrical laziness is everywhere on "Days." On "Seven Steps to Satan," a tiresome number detailing a space cult that believes aliens will soon be landing on Earth -- did this idea seem good at some point? -- Wareham rhymes "high" with "Californ-i-eye." Once, this might have sounded cute; now it just sounds affected. Later, Wareham offers only this observation: "The world is hard to understand."

Musically, Luna has returned to focusing on dreamy soundscapes after the ill-conceived layering techniques on "Pup Tent" (1997). "Dear Diary" features the understated interplay of Wareham's and Sean Eden's guitars, which jingle and chime throughout the album. And Eden's judicious wah-wah at the end of "4000 Days" make the guitarist sound like Jerry Garcia reincarnated as a mellow indie rocker. But even these sonic bright spots cannot save a trite, insipid effort.

Not surprisingly, the best number on "Days of Our Nights" is a cover. Wareham and Luna have always had a knack for homage. Wareham started the tradition in his old band, Galaxie 500, which covered the Rutles, Joy Division and Yoko Ono with aplomb. With Luna, his rendition of Beat Happening's "Indian Summer," with its ringing guitars and easy vocals, reinvented the Beat Happening original. Here, an opiated version of Guns 'n' Roses "Sweet Child O' Mine" -- Wareham singing like he's swimming through molasses and Eden reducing Slash's frenetic, testosterone-fueled solos into meandering, laconic excursions -- is the one bright spot on an otherwise dreary effort.

It turns out, natch, that previous to being shitcanned, Luna was forced by Elektra to put "Sweet Child" on the album in a last-ditch effort to save it. It's hard to say what's more disappointing: that the money men at the record label were dead right, or that even this doesn't save a depressing, disjointed, disconsolate effort.
salon.com | Nov. 12, 1999

Post by **mccutcheon** » Mon May 03, 2004 9:07 pm

first off that post was by me, but I want to know why when I did a google serach Luna didn't come up on Pax Acidus, but there was a review, on page 33 of the searches on 3 imaginary girls, so what gives, even though that page is way out of date and needs to be updated why doesn't Pax Acidus ever work in google searches?

Post by **Sloth** » Tue May 04, 2004 1:24 am

Luna is a very common word. I admit Google does not index Pax very well... but if you search for the right thing it works pretty well...

The trick to making Pax links show up better in Google is to get more people out there to link to us.

Very few people link to us anymore because most of the sites are down, discontinued, etc.

TragicPixie · Post by **TragicPixie** » Tue May 04, 2004 3:29 am

hehe I love Luna.

And I found Pax Acidus through google... and my bf has found posts on the board her before as well through it.

Post by **Sloth** » Tue May 04, 2004 3:44 am

If Mc spent as much time using computers as he does drinking he would be Tim Berners-Lee

Post by **mccutcheon** » Tue May 04, 2004 10:04 am

whoever the fuck that is I bet I can drink him under the table. hey I don't drink anymore than your wife. it ain't our fault you is such a lightweight.